OK, I know how most of the Agile community feels about Project Managers: Process over People Meetings Documentation Urrgh... But however you name the role (Agile Delivery, Scrum Master, Project Manager) and whoever does it - someone needs to help the team to: Plan Track Deliver Communicate Being a group of incredibly talented engineers does not give a team the right to ignore 3.5 of these. All too often, engineers want to dive in to designing and building great software, but see planning as a hassle, tracking as a waste of time (or an abuse of their rights), communication as an alien concept and delivery (the fun bit) as something that will be done when it's done. It may be popular to talk about being a 'self-organising team' and railing against any form of 'order' being imposed. But why is that order being imposed? Maybe it's to deal with the chaos that your s-o-t has failed to deal with so far. As organisations scale and the senior leadership gets further a
Would you push your project team until they snap? Of course not, you believe in sustainable pace. Would you expect them to consistently sacrifice family time to achieve unviable targets? Of course you wouldn't, you'd rather they delivered consistently over time while maintaining their work-life balance. Would you have them work when they're ill? No, you're not a monster. I could go on, but hopefully you get the point. Unless you're an appalling relict of an aggressive 1980s management style, you protect your team. You realise they're humans with individual lives and needs outside work. But do you apply the same standards to yourself as project manager? There's a tendency in our roles to pick up any slack ourselves, to look after the team and the project as a priority. After all, who gets hauled over the coals if things fall behind? Whose career could be stalled (or ended in case of a contractor) by one catastrophic deployment? The longer hours and call