Skip to main content

New Blog

The first blog post of a new blog.  As I sit pondering what to write I'm struck by the similarities to the start of a new project.

A blank sheet, some crudely formed ideas in need of refinement and a desire to get going.

I sometimes think of the start of a new project as a puzzle shrouded in mist.  The pieces are all in there somewhere but someone has to dive in and start working out what will need to go where.  And we're almost never left in peace to perform this task.  Harried by our own line managers for timescales, plans, risks and what resources we need, we begin to make sense of the confusion.  All the while we are pressured by everyone to deliver as much as possible, in the shortest amount of time with the least amount of resource.  To start coding as soon as possible, but having done a thorough analysis.  To run lean, but cope with issues without extending our delivery date.  To provide estimates that are both 'quick and dirty' and also perfectly accurate.

In short, we take a set of people with competing desires and differing standards and we try to provide a single vision to aim for.  We set realistic expectations, even though that almost always means someone is unhappy from the start.

It's not a role that suits everyone, just as not every personality suits the role.  Those who think they can get by on brute force and ignorance are quickly exposed, although some persevere to be almost universally hated by any team unlucky enough to suffer them (possibly the subject of a future post).

Enough for now, a PM's work is never done.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Continuous (Self) Improvement

“Everyone thinks of changing the world, but no one thinks of changing himself.” - Leo Tolstoy Introduction: Most people talk a great game about continuous improvement.  And as a group, most of us truly agree with and see the benefits of, the concept as applied to our projects and teams. Sprint Retrospectives, Post Implementation Reviews, 5S, DMAIC, PDSA (not the dog people) and so on. But... Do you practice it personally ?  I don't mean training courses, formal development plans and all the other bureaucracy that people step through stoically every year in a bid to get a pay rise.  I'm referring to the small (but meaningful) improvements we can make every day. Or to work in an Agile principle: "At regular intervals, the team (of one in this case) reflects on how  to become more effective, then tunes and adjusts  its behavior accordingly." Step 1: Feedback (aka input to the CI process): Of course, all improvements need to be identified i...

Fear and blame.

Hands up if you've ever heard someone say: "We don't have a fear-and-blame culture." And keep them up if the reaction of the 'doers' was to roll their eyes and mutter something sarcastic. It's a nice phrase to trot out at a senior leadership conference or to write in your 'best employer of 2020' application, but if you have to say it, it's probably not true. And repeating the mantra won't make it any more true. In fact, people might respect you more if you were honest and admitted that there is blame and where the boundaries lie.  At least in that scenario, the individual knows where they stand. Instead, we often have the jarring dissonance of hearing our leaders say one thing and seeing them act entirely differently. As a leader (especially a senior leader): When you stand at the front of a room and tell the assembly that there is no fear-and-blame, look at their faces.   If they mostly appear too scared to dis...

Agile Armchair Generals

If you're an Agile practitioner of any sort you will understand what I mean by Armchair Generals (if not, it may be an idea to check if you are one..). Apropos of nothing an email arrives that questions the management of your project in terms of whether it is properly 'Agile'. Feedback is, of course, a great tool.  But it must always be understood within the context of the person providing it. So when the email lands questioning the type of contingency you've built into your project or the depth of analysis performed on your requirements set, ask yourself: 1. Has the questioner spotted something you and the team have missed? It happens.  That's why independent reviews can be helpful. 2. Has the questioner misunderstood something about your project?  If so, maybe your communications weren't quite clear enough or they've missed something - it happens, we're all busy. If the questioner has understood the topic correctly and is simply disagreeing ...